Contact Us
Name:
Email Address:
Phone Number (optional):
Subject:
Message:
 
 
Contact Us Contact us
Sign in
Email Address
Password
small business login arrow  Forgot Password?
 
 

Jared Tame

Blog Post Detail
Design Lessons from MySpace and Facebook
December 3, 2007

A lot of entrepreneurs wonder why MySpace does so well considering the poor design.  MySpace does, after all, get more traffic according to Compete.com (although not according to Alexa) and apparently has twice as many users as Facebook.

I’ve never been one to admire the design of MySpace, and I think it causes a lot of confusion for entrepreneurs who are forming their companies in the early stages because that’s when a lot of design decisions are made.  I see this question come up a lot from my own clients, most of whom are entrepreneurs themselves: “So, should we intentionally make our website or application ugly, just because MySpace gets away with it and their traffic is doing so well?”

That’s where I think we should be taking a closer look at MySpace, because it does create an illusion that “ugly works” when it comes to web and application design.

First off, you should understand that MySpace’s target market is the younger crowd, specifically high school students.  There are about 17 million high school students in the United States.  High school students have two things to they’ll spend most of their time doing: homework and socializing.  So MySpace acts as the perfect medium to socialize, or waste time is what I prefer to call it.  You read that correctly: the intention behind MySpace is not to get the user off the site as quickly as possible—as is the case with Google—it’s to waste people’s time.

In order to design something to waste time, it should probably have a lot of stuff to keep someone entertained.  It doesn’t make MySpace’s design bad because it’s so cluttered, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion.  I think it looks terrible, but at the same time, it works for their audience.  To go a little further, you could draw the assumption that high school students have more free time on their hands; college students don’t.  So if you find yourself wondering why MySpace users spend more time on the site than Facebook users, I would think about it a little differently.

You could easily say the main reason MySpace has more activity is probably because high school students have more time to waste than the college students.  It doesn’t mean MySpace is a better application or better designed than Facebook.  And for that reason, it doesn’t mean you should follow the design principles of any given company because your own target market and business objectives will obviously be different.

What it comes down to is this: every startup has its own unique objectives and target market.  For MySpace, the objective seems to be entertainment and expression.  If you look at Facebook, it’s more of a contact manager and a way to keep updated about what your friends have been doing.  Once Facebook opened its doors to developers, that has been changing and moving towards entertainment.  For most of my clients, the objective is to deliver information quickly and easily.  In most cases, your audience doesn’t have much time to waste, so you should probably stick to Keep It Simple.

About the Author

Jared Tame is an entrepreneur who has worked with hundreds of clients on website design, marketing, and sales, and currently works with StartPal providing high-quality, low-cost website design and e-commerce solutions to small businesses and startups.

Trackbacks to this story
There are no trackbacks...

Comments About this story
wrong.  ugly is the new black in the design world.

MySpace isn't the first to embrace 'undesign'.  Look at geocities, eBay and Amazon.  The difference is MySpace users are kids that will do anything their parents tell them not to.  They embrace chaos and want to challenge the status quo of "good design", thus they control the design of their portals to reflect their emotion (or as any good shrink would tell you, the emotion they want you to perceive).  Until I see comparisions of 'length of visit' or 'pages per visit' for MySpace vs Facebook, I don't think "time" plays a part in the design (or success) of either site.

Why does ugly work for eBay, Amazon, MySpace, and countless others?  Because the vast majority of americans don't care about design.  They live in homes that scare interior designers, drive cars plastered with bumper stickers, read poorly designed printed materials, and work in architectural nightmares called office buildings.  "undesign" will continue beyond MySpace and will continue to permeate every element of our lives, until good design becomes trendy again.
Posted by: sho'fr 12/3/2007 at 2:22 PM

Guys, there are PLENTY of ugly web sites that do horribly.  Just because the design of popular sites tends to be "lacking" doesn't mean it's a requirement for success.

Successful sites work because their core business model works so well, not because their site design is good or bad.  Don't get me wrong, I'm all for good Web design, but let's not attribute lame Web design to business success.
Posted by: Wil Schroter 12/3/2007 at 2:36 PM

very nice article. I never thought of MySpace and Facebook like that before.
Posted by: fred333 12/3/2007 at 3:51 PM

Sho'fr,
As I said, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but you have to remember that well-designed products are a business model for some companies, like Apple.  The iPod was not the only mp3 player around, despite the amount of traction it gained.  The iPhone is the same story, and probably the only phone to cost $599 at the time it was released, but they continue to hit their targets.

Wil has a point.  The design is not something that will define the success or failure of any business, but it usually helps.
Posted by: Jared 12/3/2007 at 9:26 PM

MySpace is ugly, though they have been taking some major steps towards a better design lately.
Posted by: David Mackey 12/3/2007 at 10:44 PM

Jared - The iPod didn't succeed because it looked good in the visual sense (which it did), it succeded because it was easy to use and the iPod + iTunes combination was a complete solution (compared to rivals like the Rio and Zen).  You could say that the UI was designed well, but that goes well beyond being physically "ugly" or "pretty" and into predicting the ways users would interact with their music.


And in retrospect, have you seen a first generation iPod recently? (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/35/Ipod_1G.png)  By today's standards, its ugly and unrefined, but very very successful.

Posted by: sho'fr 12/6/2007 at 10:37 AM

Hi Jared,
It sounds like you would you recommend networking on MySpace if your target market is the same, but on Facebook if it's an older age group (eg mums)?
I haven't tried either site - found MS too confusing (maybe I'm too old at 35!), and haven't even looked at FB because I thought it was more of the same...
Cheers,
Jane :)
Posted by: Jane 12/14/2007 at 8:31 PM



Add a Comment (Not logged in)  Register / Sign in

Name:
 
Email Address:
 
Homepage:
  (ex. http://www.gobignetwork.com)

 

Enter the Text in the Image Below (to confirm you're not a robot)

 


(Wil is immediately notified of your comment)


© Copyright 2009 Go Big Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved
*Each investor listed in GoBigNetwork as a potential funding resource for members must be an “Accredited Investor” as that term is used in federal and state securities laws. To be listed, every investor must supply qualifying information, and certify that it meets all criteria for Accredited Investor status. GoBigNetwork provides a platform through which members and Accredited Investors may identify each other, but makes no actual or implied representations concerning the availability of any potential funding or funding resource GoBigNetwork neither effects nor attempts to effect any funding or business relationship between members and any listed investor, and nothing contained in this website should be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase a security. Members and accredited investors listed in GoBigNetwork are solely responsible for compliance such federal, state or local laws which may apply between them in any funding transaction. GoBigNetwork is compensated solely by membership fees and fees paid by Accredited Investors for the opportunity to be listed as potential funding resources.

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z 
DE  OH
Crunch Profiles  Crunch Companies
Go BIG Blogs
Email this blog post to a friend.


Your Name:


Your Email Address:


Friend's Email Address:

Send entry to friend   Cancel